The Latest From SPCIn brief, the court said they want to hear the constitutional questions as presented in our original filing and the questions regarding HR-4343 statutory language. That is all we asked for and everything we asked for. The time line is established in the order which sets another limitation for us. If you know someone interested in this case as a plaintiff and is not listed at this time, the clock will run out for that choice before this case is heard. It's time to make a decision, and plaintiffs will not be accepted past that point. To all: Today we received the full order from the Court of Appeals which is attached for you to review. I'll briefly go through it to explain the meaning of the order. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. 1. The order declines the motion to dismiss by refering the case to the three judge panel to hear the case. 2. In regard to the reference of two of our plaintiffs, the issue of their status is not at question. Professor Turley already won that arguement. Their status was questioned under the 60 day rule, but we could show that they were provided back dated denial letters which was no fault of the individual. The "why" of this procedure is now going to be part, by order of the court. 3. The order grants that all our claims under the original filing of this waiver case AND now the language of HR-4343 ( since the DOJ used it as the grounds for dismissal ) will be treated by this Court of Appeals. 4. The order sets out the written brief schedule, AND states that oral arguements WILL be scheduled by the court. In brief, the court said they want to hear the constitutional questions as presented in our original filing and the questions regarding HR-4343 statutory language. That is all we asked for and everything we asked for. The time line is established in the order which sets another limitation for us. If you know someone interested in this case as a plaintiff and is not listed at this time, the clock will run out for that choice before this case is heard. It's time to make a decision, and plaintiffs will not be accepted past that point. Lew Tetlow SPC
BigJetCity.com |
Web site hosting by All Brevard Web Sites